Is Kazakhstan a Market Economy Yet? Getting Warmer

Sharon Eicher
Additional contact information
Sharon Eicher: KIMEP

Development and Comp Systems from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: Transition from planned to a market economy is an evolutionary process. Evolutions do not have finite beginning and ending points. We may look to the beginning of transition in 1991 when the Soviet Union broke up, or we may see it as beginning earlier, when the Soviet Union began to allow its firms to engage in private sales of output that exceeded state plans and to independently take part in international trade agreements. At what point do we say that transition is complete? Hence, it is quite difficult to say when any country begins and completes its transition. The United States and the European Union have categorized Kazakhstan differently with regard to its degree of transition. The United States removed non market economy status from Kazakhstan, whereas the EU gave Kazakhstan an intermediate status. The first question that this work asks is how do these political bodies rank a country's market orientation, and how did they arrive at different conclusions? These results are then compared to what transitional economists have to say on the evolution from a planned to a market economy. The second question is, how do theoretical, academic economists differ in their analysis of the transition process? By creating unique criteria sets from several papers, can one say that, according to any set, Kazakhstan is a market economy? We conclude that the reform process in Kazakhstan is still underway. The government and the economy have experienced many radical reforms, but none completely satisfies the necessary conditions for being categorized as a market economy.

Keywords: transition; market; economy; non-market; economy; Kornai; de; Melo; Frydman; Rapaczynski; Lavigne; Svejnar (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O P (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 18 pages
Date: 2004-03-24
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cis, nep-cwa and nep-tra
Note: Type of Document - doc; pages: 18. Review of criteria that may be used for categorizing if a transition economy is or is not a 'market economy' or if it is still in transition.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/dev/papers/0403/0403008.pdf (application/pdf)
https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/dev/papers/0403/0403008.ps.gz (application/postscript)
https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/dev/papers/0403/0403008.doc.gz (application/msword)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpdc:0403008

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Development and Comp Systems from University Library of Munich, Germany
Bibliographic data for series maintained by EconWPA ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).