A Test of the Controversial Assumptions in the McKinnon-Shaw Hypothesis versus Neo-Structuralist Propositions An Empirical Test From a Field Survey in the Congo
Development and Comp Systems from EconWPA
This paper attempts to shed light on the efficiency/effectiveness issues of informal financial markets and the pattern of portfolio allocation shift in response to change in interest rate, in the process of financial liberalization. The two issues have been both controversial and hotly debated between proponents of the McKinnon-Shaw liberalization and Neo-structuralist economists. To examine whether interest rate changes are associated with the former or the latter view in the Congo we resort to a survey of household portfolio behavior in informal finance. Survey results suggest that informal finance is relatively effective in intermediating funds and providing financial services and access. In addition, the portfolio pattern indicates that households shift resource more from informal loan to deposits than from cash. These results provide some support for the Neostructuralists’argument; rejecting thus the McKinnon-Shaw argument that higher bank interest rates would generally increase investment.
Keywords: Portfolio allocation; interest rates; informal finance; Liberalizationist; Neostructuralist; Congo; Africa (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O P (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Note: Type of Document - pdf; pages: 13. McKinnon-Shaw Hypothesis versus Neo-Structuralist assumption on the efficiency/effectiveness issues of informal financial markets
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpdc:0511025
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Development and Comp Systems from EconWPA
Series data maintained by EconWPA ().