L'actionnaire minoritaire, le commissaire, l'avocat et le juge: histoire d'une fusion litigieuse
Additional contact information
Stéphane Trebucq: Université Montesquieu-Bordeaux IV
Economic History from EconWPA
The case of a French merger can be used to better understand the nature of conflicts of interest and cognitive conflicts between accountants, shareholders, lawyers and judges. This is especially the case when exchange ratios are unfairly established. When caught in a situation of asymmetrical information, minority shareholders try to obtain more information about the auditors' report through a trial. The financial knowledge possessed by the judge then becomes a necessary condition if shareholders are to be protected.
Keywords: Auditor; minority shareholder; merger; trial; exchange ratio; fairness (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: N (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-acc
Note: Type of Document - pdf; pages: 24. in « L’entreprise, le chiffre et le droit », éditeurs J.G. Degos et S. Trébucq, Bordeaux (2005), pp. 385-407.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpeh:0503021
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Economic History from EconWPA
Series data maintained by EconWPA ().