THE CAPM IS ALIVE AND WELL

Ravi Jagannathan and Zhenyu Wang

Finance from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: In empirical studies of the CAPM, it is commonly assumed that, (a) the return to the value-weighted portfolio of all stocks is a reasonable proxy for the return on the market portfolio of all assets in the economy, and (b) betas of assets remain constant over time. Under these assumptions, Fama and French (1992) find that the relation between average return and beta is flat. We argue that these two auxiliary assumptions are not reasonable. We demonstrate that when these assumptions are relaxed, the empirical support for the CAPM is very strong. When human capital is also included in measuring wealth, the CAPM is able to explain 28\% of the cross sectional variation in average returns in the 100 portfolio studied by Fama and French. When, in addition, betas are allowed to vary over the business cycle, the CAPM is able to explain 57\%. More important, relative size does not explain what is left unexplained after taking sampling errors into account.

JEL-codes: G (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 57 pages
Date: 1994-02-28
Note: 57 pages, postscript
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/fin/papers/9402/9402001.pdf (application/pdf)
https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/fin/papers/9402/9402001.ps.gz (application/postscript)

Related works:
Working Paper: The CAPM is alive and well (1993)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpfi:9402001

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Finance from University Library of Munich, Germany
Bibliographic data for series maintained by EconWPA ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).