Crop Yield and Price Distributional Effects on Revenue Hedging

Viswanath Tirupattur, Robert J. Hauser and Nabil M. Chaherli
Additional contact information
Viswanath Tirupattur: Lincoln Investment Management Inc.
Robert J. Hauser: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Nabil M. Chaherli: International Food Policy Research Institute

Finance from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: The use of crop yield futures contracts is examined. The expectation being modeled here reflects that of an Illinois corn and soybeans producer at planting, of revenue realized at harvest. The effects of using price and crop yield contracts are measured by comparing the results of the expected distribution to the expected distribution found under five general alternatives: 1) a revenue hedge using just price futures, 2) a revenue hedge using crop yield futures, 3) an unhedged scenario where revenue is determined by realized prices and yields, 4) an unhedged scenario where revenue is determined by realized prices and yields and by participation in government support programs with deficiency payments, and 5) a no hedge scenario where revenue is determined by realized prices and yields and by participation in a proposed revenue-assurance program. We draw four major conclusions from the results. First, hedging effectiveness using the new crop yield contract depends critically on yield basis risk which presumably can be reduced considerably by covering large geographical areas. Second, crop yield futures can be used in conjunction with price futures to derive risk management benefits significantly higher than using either of the two alone. Third, hedging using price and crop yield futures has a potential to offer benefits larger than those from the simulated revenue assurance program. However, the robustness of the findings depends largely on whether yield basis risk varies significantly across regions. Finally, the qualitative results described by the above three conclusions do not change depending on whether yields are distributed according to the beta or lognormal distribution.

Keywords: Yield; Ditribution; Hedging; Monte-Carlo (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q13 Q14 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 16 pages
Date: 1996-12-17
Note: Type of Document - Microsoft Word 7; prepared on P.C.; to print on HP Laser Jet; pages: 16. Office for Futures and Options Research (OFOR) at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Working Paper 96-05. For a complete list of OFOR working Papers see
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/fin/papers/9612/9612004.ps.gz (application/postscript)
https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/fin/papers/9612/9612004.html (text/html)
https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/fin/papers/9612/9612004.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpfi:9612004

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Finance from University Library of Munich, Germany
Bibliographic data for series maintained by EconWPA ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).