Bargaining Structure, Fairness and Efficiency
Matthew Rabin
General Economics and Teaching from University Library of Munich, Germany
Abstract:
Experiments with the ultimatum game -- where one party can make a take-it-or-leave-it offer to a second party on how to split a pie -- illustrate that conventional game theory has been wrong in its predictions regarding the simplest of bargaining settings: Even when one party has enormous bargaining power, she may be able to extract all the surplus from trade, because the second party will reject grossly unequal proposals. But ultimatum games may lead us to misconstrue some general lessons: Given plausible assumptions about what preferences underlie ultimatum-game behavior, alternative bargaining structures that also give a Proposer enormous bargaining power may lead to very different outcomes. For virtually any outcome in which the Proposer gets more than half the pie, there exists a bargaining structure yielding that outcome. Notably, many bargaining structures can lead to inefficiency even under complete information. Moreover, inefficiency is partly caused by asymmetric bargaining power, so that "fairer environments" can lead to more efficient outcomes. Results characterize how other features of simple bargaining structures affect the efficiency and distribution of bargaining outcomes, and generate testable hypotheses for simple non- ultimatum bargaining games.
JEL-codes: A12 A13 B49 C70 D63 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 20 pages
Date: 2001-01-02
Note: 20 pages Acrobat .pdf
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/get/papers/0012/0012001.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: Bargaining Structure, Fairness and Efficiency (2000) 
Working Paper: Bargaining Structure, Fairness and Efficiency (1997) 
Working Paper: Bargaining Structure, Fairness and Efficiency (1997) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpgt:0012001
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in General Economics and Teaching from University Library of Munich, Germany
Bibliographic data for series maintained by EconWPA ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).