Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Thomas Colignatus ()
General Economics and Teaching from University Library of Munich, Germany
Metaprognostica arises when one studies forecasting behaviour. Deceitful forecasts can mean profits, and hence deception is a real problem for market forecasts. For governments, Public Choice studies the behaviour of governmental institutions and officials while assuming the hypothesis of economic 'selfish' rationality, and hence there can be deceitful forecasts in government too. For academic forecasters who live by the scientific code, metaprognostics is an exercise in humour. Traditional prediction theory, that assumes no deceit, is a rich source for possible avenues for deceit, and it also provides a benchmark for metaprognostics. Metaprognostics provides an additional argument for the proposition that a democracy is well served by an Economic Supreme Court.
JEL-codes: A0 C0 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cdm
Note: 15 pages html, no graphs
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpgt:0110002
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in General Economics and Teaching from University Library of Munich, Germany
Bibliographic data for series maintained by EconWPA ().