An Overview of Strategy Development Models and the Ward-Rivani Model

David Ward and Elena Rivani
Additional contact information
Elena Rivani: European School of Economics

General Economics and Teaching from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: Numerous models for developing strategy, defining and aligning competitive advantage have been proposed over the years (and even centuries if we consider Arian, Sun Tzu etc.) including probably the most famous of all, the 5 forces model by Porter (P5F). With publications in the field of strategy now in the thousands it is difficult to get an overall picture of how to classify and appreciate strategy tools and models. Mintzberg et al. have developed schools of thought to help alleviate and categorise this problem but this approach lacks a comparison of the models found in industry e.g. BCG, 7S McKinsey, ANSOFF etc. Consequently at academic level (but not only) we see models like P5F, etc. predominate while tools like SWOT, PEST, ARC etc. populate the consultancy arena and operative levels of the organisation. The purpose of this paper is therefore to provide an overview and comparison of selected models used in the development of business strategy along side a brief discussion of schools of strategic thought. Judging by the bibliography searched and, perhaps, the major appeal of this paper, is that a selection of common strategy development models and tools are compared systematically for the first time in one single paper. In fact it was found that models, at least in Italy, are rarely compared and if they are, it is on a one-to-one basis. The intent is to at least start to bridge and compare models and show how new models can be realised. The paper closes with the proposal of a new model, the Ward-Rivani model, which does not claim to be the most universal rather a complementary and perhaps useful platform for future work on strategy.

Keywords: Strategy; Models; Porter; Ward-Rivani model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 24 pages
Date: 2005-06-03, Revised 2005-06-07
Note: Type of Document - doc; pages: 24. This is a working paper and we would be very grateful to read your comments about this work.
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/get/papers/0506/0506002.pdf (application/pdf)
https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/get/papers/0506/0506002.doc.gz (application/msword)
https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/get/papers/0506/0506002.ps.gz (application/postscript)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpgt:0506002

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in General Economics and Teaching from University Library of Munich, Germany
Bibliographic data for series maintained by EconWPA ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).