# Proper definitions for Risk and Uncertainty (July update with (a) better notation, (b) relative risk (c) an application to insurance)

*Thomas Cool*

Additional contact information

Thomas Cool: Consultancy & Econometrics

Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: *Thomas Colignatus* ()

General Economics and Teaching from EconWPA

**Abstract:**
The commonly adopted definitions of risk and uncertainty generate conceptual problems and inconsistencies, and they are a source of confusion in general. However, alternative and proper definitions are: (1) First there is the distinction between certainty and uncertainty. (2) Uncertainty forks into known (assumed) and unknown probabilities. (3) Unknown probabilities forks into known categories and unknown categories. (4) Known categories forks into 'including the uncertainties in the probabilities by explicitly assuming a uniform distribution' (Laplace) or neglect (or use other non-probabilistic techniques). Note that the term 'risk' has not been used in the 4 points above, so that an independent definition is possible. 'Risk' can be defined as the absolute value of probable loss, i.e. as rho = -E[x

**JEL-codes:** A00 C00 G00 (search for similar items in EconPapers)

**Date:** 1993-02-25, Revised 1999-07-08

**Note:** html file with Images subdirectory

**References:** Add references at CitEc

**Citations** Track citations by RSS feed

**Downloads:** (external link)

http://econwpa.repec.org/eps/get/papers/9902/9902002.html (text/html)

**Related works:**

This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

**Export reference:** BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text

**Persistent link:** https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpgt:9902002

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in General Economics and Teaching from EconWPA

Series data maintained by EconWPA ().