Proper definitions for Risk and Uncertainty (July update with (a) better notation, (b) relative risk (c) an application to insurance)

Thomas Cool
Additional contact information
Thomas Cool: Consultancy & Econometrics
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Thomas Colignatus ()

General Economics and Teaching from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: The commonly adopted definitions of risk and uncertainty generate conceptual problems and inconsistencies, and they are a source of confusion in general. However, alternative and proper definitions are: (1) First there is the distinction between certainty and uncertainty. (2) Uncertainty forks into known (assumed) and unknown probabilities. (3) Unknown probabilities forks into known categories and unknown categories. (4) Known categories forks into 'including the uncertainties in the probabilities by explicitly assuming a uniform distribution' (Laplace) or neglect (or use other non-probabilistic techniques). Note that the term 'risk' has not been used in the 4 points above, so that an independent definition is possible. 'Risk' can be defined as the absolute value of probable loss, i.e. as rho = -E[x

JEL-codes: A00 C00 G00 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1993-02-25, Revised 1999-07-08
Note: html file with Images subdirectory
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/get/papers/9902/9902002.html (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpgt:9902002

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in General Economics and Teaching from University Library of Munich, Germany
Bibliographic data for series maintained by EconWPA ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).