Portfolio Effects and Merger Control: Full-line Forcing as an Entry Deterrence Strategy

Thibaud Vergé

Industrial Organization from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: The ''portfolio effect theory'' developed by the European Commission in merger control is at the center of a fierce international row with the US authorities who believe that this theory has no economic foundations. This paper aims to provide a counter-argument and shows that full-line forcing may be used by the holder a comprehensive range of products as an entry deterrence device to maintain its monopoly power. However, due to buyer power on the retail market, this will happen only if entry is not profitable for the industry as a whole. The effects on consumer welfare are ambiguous. Full-line forcing will reduce prices in the first period, but as it helps maintaining monopoly power, is harmful in the long-term.

Keywords: Portfolio effects; competition policy; full-line forcing; entry deterrence. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L4 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 24 pages
Date: 2003-01-22
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-com
Note: Type of Document - Pdf; prepared on PC-ScientificWord; to print on Postscript; pages: 24 ; figures: included
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/io/papers/0301/0301010.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpio:0301010

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Industrial Organization from University Library of Munich, Germany
Bibliographic data for series maintained by EconWPA ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).