Sensitivity of Tariffs and Quotas: A Signaling Game

Mohammad Amin ()

International Trade from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: In a model with cost-based informational asymmetry and trade policy determined endogenously, we show that tariffs and import-quotas have different sensitivities to the signal sent by the private agents to the home government. Specifically, the optimal quota is shown to be more sensitive than the optimal tariff as measured in terms of the reduction in equilibrium import-volume caused by the change in the government's perception about the true cost of the domestic firm. Consequently, signaling distortion is larger in the quota regime than in the tariff regime. Non-equivalence between the two policy tools follows from this difference in their sensitivities. The model is benchmarked so that under complete information tariffs and quotas are equivalent.

Keywords: Trade Policy; Singnaling (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 30 pages
Date: 2004-01-22
Note: Type of Document - sensitivity-effect.pdf; prepared on Win98; to print on Letter; pages: 30; figures: None. None
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/it/papers/0401/0401003.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpit:0401003

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in International Trade from University Library of Munich, Germany
Bibliographic data for series maintained by EconWPA ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).