DO AGGREGATE MEASURES OF MISMATCH MEASURE MISMATCH?A TIME SERIES ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONCEPTS

Horst Entorf

Labor and Demography from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: This paper discusses the performance of popular mismatch indexes proposed by Lilien (1982), Jackman and Roper (1987), Jackman, Layard and Savouri (1991), and Lambert (1988). Results in the literature show that, with the exception of Lambert’s index, measures of mismatch reveal decreasing or at least stable mismatch for European labour markets. This result contradicts micro evidence which suggests declining mobility. Time series analysis performed in the paper tackles this puzzle, and shows that indices consisting of aggregate time series may lead to false conclusions. Measures of mismatch fail when time series shift upward: Without changing the relative structure between individual groups (regions, skills, occupation), this paper shows that trending time series imply decreasing mismatch for all but one index. The only exception is Lambert’s rho. Here stochastic trends lead to a spurious increase of mismatch. Keywords: Mismatch, labour mobility, time series analysis JEL classification: J60, C22, C43

Keywords: mismatch indicators; trending time series; spurious results (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C22 C43 J60 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 25 pages
Date: 2003-12-25
Note: Type of Document - pdf; pages: 25
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/lab/papers/0312/0312006.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpla:0312006

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Labor and Demography from University Library of Munich, Germany
Bibliographic data for series maintained by EconWPA ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).