The Measurement and Structure of Household Wealth

F. Juster, James Smith and Frank Stafford

Labor and Demography from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: This paper deals with methodological issues that arise in measuring household wealth. Two prominent American household surveys--the PSID and SCF--rely on different methodological approaches to the measurement of household wealth. In particular, SCF oversamples high-income households and has a far more extensive set of questions. In the top one percent of the wealth distribution, better measures of wealth are related to over- sampling of very wealthy households and the number of questions that are asked. However, one can characterize total household wealth holdings for the overwhelming majority of households with a relatively moderate number of questions. When successive waves of wealth modules are used to compute savings, the verdict on quality is more cautious, in part due to the inherently lartger role measurement error plays in any first difference formulation.

JEL-codes: J (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 23 pages
Date: 2004-02-20
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-lab
Note: Type of Document - pdf; pages: 23. Labour Economics, Vol. 6, No. 2, 1999, pp. 253-275.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/lab/papers/0402/0402009.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: The measurement and structure of household wealth (1999)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpla:0402009

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Labor and Demography from University Library of Munich, Germany
Bibliographic data for series maintained by EconWPA ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).