LIABILITY, REGULATION AND ENDOGENOUS RISK: INCIDENCE AND SEVERITY OF ESCAPED PRESCRIBED FIRES IN THE UNITED STATES
Jonathan Yoder ()
Law and Economics from University Library of Munich, Germany
Prescribed fire is a useful but risky method for reducing general wildfire risk and improving wildlife habitat, biodiversity, timber growth, and agricultural forage. In the past the fifteen years, laws is some states have been adopted to support the use of prescribed fire. This article examines the effect of liability law and common regulations on the incidence and severity of escaped prescribed fires in the United States from 1970 to 2002. Regression results show that stringent statutory liability law and regulation tends to reduce the number and severity of escaped prescribed fires on private land, but not on federal land where state liability law does not directly apply.
Keywords: endogenous risk; prescribed fire economics; liability law (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K32 Q2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-law and nep-reg
Note: Type of Document - pdf; pages: 37
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: Liability, Regulation, and Endogenous Risk: Incidence and Severity of Escaped Prescribed Fires in the United States (2005)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwple:0506003
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Law and Economics from University Library of Munich, Germany
Bibliographic data for series maintained by EconWPA ().