The Welfare Losses from Price Matching Policies
Aaron Edlin () and
Eric R. Emch
Additional contact information
Eric R. Emch: Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley
Law and Economics from University Library of Munich, Germany
Abstract:
Several recent papers argue that price matching policies raise equilibrium prices. We add to this literature by considering potential welfare losses, which have two sources: Harberger triangles from high prices and Posner rectangles from over-entry. We compare markets with price matching and free entry to the traditional concerns of antitrust law, monopoly or cartel markets without entry. Price matching with entry leads to greater welfare losses than both monopoly and cartel in markets with a low ratio of fixed to marginal cost and low demand elasticity. We illustrate these general results using parameters from the wholesale gasoline and air travel markets, and relate our model to price matching on NASDAQ.
JEL-codes: D43 D60 K21 L16 L41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 38 pages
Date: 1998-03-12, Revised 1998-05-26
Note: 38 pages. LaTeX format (.dvi), Six figures are embedded in the text.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/le/papers/9803/9803001.dvi.gz (application/x-dvi)
https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/le/papers/9803/9803001.pdf (application/pdf)
https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/le/papers/9803/9803001.ps.gz (application/postscript)
Related works:
Working Paper: The Welfare Losses from Price Matching Policies (1997) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwple:9803001
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Law and Economics from University Library of Munich, Germany
Bibliographic data for series maintained by EconWPA ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).