Real Estate and Capital Gains Debate

Michael Hudson and Kris Feder
Additional contact information
Michael Hudson: The Jerome Levy Economics Institute
Kris Feder: The Jerome Levy Economics Institute

Macroeconomics from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: This working paper seeks to elucidate the role of real estate in the capital gains issue, indicating the quantitative orders of magnitude involved. We offer two main observations. First, generous capital consumption allowances (CCAs) greatly magnify the proportion newly constructed buildings, of course, but also on land and old buildings being sold and resold. Our tax code allows for properties to be re- depreciated by their new owners after a sale or swap, permitting real estate investors to recapture principal again and again on the same structure. When CCAs have been excessive relative to true economic depreciation, as they were during in the 1980s, capital gains have been commensurately larger than the actual increase in property prices. Second, very little of real estate cash flow is taxable as ordinary income, so the capital gains tax is currently the only major federal levy paid by the real estate industry. CCAs and tax-deductible mortgage interest payments combine to exempt most of real estate cash flow from the income tax. This encourages debt pyramiding as it throws the burden of public finance onto other taxpayers. A central conclusion of our study is that better statistics on asset values and capital gains are needed-or, more to the point, a better accounting format. The economic effects of a capital gains tax depend upon how the gains are made. The present GNP/NIPA format fails to differentiate between wealth and overhead; between value from production and value from obligation. In particular, theory and measurement should distinguish real estate from other sources of capital gains-and, within the category of real estate, distinguish land from built improvements. Markets for immovable structures and for land have distinctive inherent feature and are shaped by distinctive institutional constraints.

JEL-codes: E (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 57 pages
Date: 1997-11-05
Note: Type of Document - Acrobat PDF; prepared on IBM PC; to print on PostScript; pages: 57; figures: included
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/mac/papers/9711/9711004.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpma:9711004

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Macroeconomics from University Library of Munich, Germany
Bibliographic data for series maintained by EconWPA ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).