The Utilization of Human Capital in the U.S., 1975-1992: Patterns of Work and Earnings Among Working Age Males
Robert Haveman,
Lawrence Buron and
Andrew Bershadker
Additional contact information
Lawrence Buron: The Jerome Levy Economics Institute
Andrew Bershadker: The Jerome Levy Economics Institute
Macroeconomics from University Library of Munich, Germany
Abstract:
Fundamental changes in labor market patterns among U.S. prime-age men over the past two decades have been the focus of numerous recent research studies and media accounts. Increases in wage inequality and in male joblessness are the most important of these changes; assertions of an increase in part-time and "contingent" work have also been made. In addition, there is evidence of a more general decline in the total annual hours of market work of the typical working-age male. In this paper, we focus on civilian non-student 18-64 year-old males, and present a new statistical indicator of the extent to which the human capital of this group (and subgroups within it) is underutilized. We call our indicator the Capacity Utilization Rate (CUR), as it measures the extent to which the use of capital falls short of a full utilization norm. We view the human capital embodies in an individual (or a group) to be the package of characteristics possessed by the person or group that yield value to the economy if used in productive activities. These characteristics include such things as basic ability, schooling skills, work experience, and health status. Each individual's (estimated) wage rate is a function of his endowment of these characteristics. The wage rate is, in turn, an estimate of the market valuation of the hourly rental value of an individual's productive activities is reflected in the market-determined "use-value" of these characteristics. Hence, the annual value of the human capital of an individual (or group) is the amount that could be earned were the productive characteristics of the individual fully utilized. We consider an individual's human capital to be fully utilized if he works full time-full year, that is 52 weeks per year and 40 hours per week. We use the CUR indicator to examine trends in human capital utilization for the population of working-age males, and for various population subgroups, over the 1975-1992 period. We also examine trends in the reasons given for the failure to fully utilize human capital, and categorize them into two sets-those reasons reflecting exogenous constraints on work (e.g., inability to find work) and those that reflect individual response to labor market and other incentives (e.g., retirement before age 65).
JEL-codes: E (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 50 pages
Date: 1998-03-03
Note: Type of Document - Acrobat PDF; prepared on IBM PC; to print on PostScript; pages: 50; figures: included
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/mac/papers/9803/9803002.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: The Utilization of Human Capital in the U.S., 1975-1992: Patterns of Work and Earnings Among Working-Age Males (1996) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpma:9803002
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Macroeconomics from University Library of Munich, Germany
Bibliographic data for series maintained by EconWPA ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).