Capital Account Regulations and Macroeconomic Policy: Two Latin American Experiences

Guillermo Le Fort V. and Carlos Budnevich L.
Additional contact information
Guillermo Le Fort V.: The Jerome Levy Economics Institute
Carlos Budnevich L.: The Jerome Levy Economics Institute
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Guillermo Le Fort Varela

Macroeconomics from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: A resurgence of perceived opportunities by international investors has resulted in a new policy debate regarding the regulation of capital flows into certain South American countries. The integrationist camp defends totally open markets on the grounds that they result in a more efficient financial sector, greater asset diversification, and other benefits, while those in the isolationist camp support regulating capital inflows on the grounds that they generate macroeconomic instability and reduce the effectiveness of monetary policy. Noting that there are both costs and benefits associated with external capital flows, Guillermo Le Fort V., international director of the Central Bank of Chile, and Carlos Budnevich L., manager of financial analysis for the Central Bank of Chile, argue against both extremes, opting instead for a policy falling somewhere between the two. An intermediate policy of gradual and limited financial integration has been adopted in Chile and Colombia, two countries experiencing capital account surpluses. Le Fort and Budnevich examine the macroeconomic and financial results during the 1990s of the countries' policies regarding external capital accounts. In the early 1980s the Chilean financial system was wracked by insolvency that was deepened by recession. By 1983 volatile international capital inflows, resulting from the removal of restrictions to such flows, had precipated a widespread crisis. Having weathered this experience, Chile's financial institutions are cautious and concerned about maintaining moderate current account deficits. Policies to accomplish this goal include a targeted range for the medium-term current account deficit, foreign exchange market and capital account regulations, and a limit to the degree of integration of external and domestic markets. The authors note, however, that the reserve requirement cannot stem currency appreciation, which has averaged about 4 percent per year. They also conclude that capital account regulations have not impaired the financial system. "In fact, despite the regulations, the financial system and the capital markets have achieved very significant development in Chile over the past few years."

JEL-codes: E (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 46 pages
Date: 1998-07-16
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ifn and nep-pke
Note: Type of Document - Acrobat PDF; prepared on IBM PC - PC; to print on PostScript; pages: 46; figures: included
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/mac/papers/9807/9807003.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Capital Account Regulations and Macroeconomic Policy: Two Latin American Experiences (1997)
Working Paper: Capital Account Regulations and Macroeconomic Policy: Two Latin American Experiences (1996)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpma:9807003

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Macroeconomics from University Library of Munich, Germany
Bibliographic data for series maintained by EconWPA ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).