Learning in Economics: Where Do We Stand?
Tilman Slembeck ()
Microeconomics from University Library of Munich, Germany
Abstract:
This paper briefly reviews the current literature on learning in economics from a behavioral point of view. It critically compares theory with aspects of learning in real-life and with evidence from laboratory experiments, and argues that most customary approaches lack criteria for their applicability. Hence, there is a need for a theory that includes criteria when to employ which theory or which element(s) of existing theories contingent on the situation or environment in question. A discussion of several unsolved issues in economic learning stresses the fundamental role of learning conditions that have be neglected in the literature, but are accounted for in behavioral approaches such as "contingent learning".
Keywords: economic learning; behavioral economics; experiments; game theory; information feedback; contingent learning (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B4 C9 D8 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 22 pages
Date: 2000-07-05
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-evo
Note: Type of Document - PDF; prepared on IBM PC; to print on HP/PostScript/; pages: 22 ; figures: included. Discussion Paper No. 9907, Department of Economics, University of St.Gallen, August 1999, downloads at http://www.fgn.unisg.ch/public/public.htm
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/mic/papers/0004/0004007.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpmi:0004007
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Microeconomics from University Library of Munich, Germany
Bibliographic data for series maintained by EconWPA ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).