Additive and multiplicative uncertainty revisited: what explains the contrasting biases?

Ciaran Driver and Tommaso Valletti

Microeconomics from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: This note addresses the reasons why additive and multiplicative demand uncertainty produce differently signed biases in output price as compared to the certainty case in two-period monopoly models. Although the result is known in the literature different papers tend to assume one or other model without discussion, possibly because the result has hitherto been unexplained. This note gives an intuitive explanation for the result after first presenting a parsimonious review of the two models. We also discuss which, if either, of the two models is more realistic.

JEL-codes: D1 D2 D3 D4 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 10 pages
Date: 2004-02-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mic
Note: Type of Document - pdf; pages: 10; figures: 1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/mic/papers/0402/0402012.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpmi:0402012

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Microeconomics from University Library of Munich, Germany
Bibliographic data for series maintained by EconWPA ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).