The Finding Cost of Natural Gas: Technological Change versus Resource Depletion

John Cuddington and Diana L. Moss
Additional contact information
Diana L. Moss: Office of Economic Policy, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Microeconomics from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: This study provides an empirical analysis of the extent to which ongoing technological change has offset the effect of ongoing depletion on the cost of finding additional reserves of natural gas. In the process, we develop a new index of technological change for exploration and development (E&D) activities in the natural gas industry by identifying new technologies by year of diffusion using a detailed analysis of technical trade publications. Counting the number of technological diffusions in each year, one gets an indication of the rate of technological advance over time. The cumulative total is an indicator of the level of technology. Next, we motivate the inclusion of our measure of the current state of technology in the production function and the implied cost function for finding natural gas. This is done using alternative indices of capital obtained from the quality ladders and varieties models in the recent "endogenous growth" literature. Our estimated cost equations isolate the separate effects of depletion and technological improvement on the finding cost for natural gas. Counter factual simulations based on the cost functions suggest that technological change played a major role in allaying what would otherwise have been a sharp rise in production costs as additional reserves became harder and more expensive to find. Hence, our analysis provides empirical evidence of the common claim in the resource literature that technology has largely counteracted increasing resource scarcity in at least one nonrenewable resource sector, the natural gas industry.

Keywords: technological change; productivity growth; cost functions; quality ladders model; varieties model; nonrenewable resource depletion. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D24 L71 Q31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1996-10-24, Revised 1998-07-30
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-env
Note: Type of Document - WordPerfect; prepared on IBM PC ; to print on HP; pages: ; figures: included on jctables.wk4 and fig1_jc.pre. Economics Department, Georgetown University Office of Economic Policy, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. The views and findings expressed in this paper are those of the authors alone and should not be attributed to the FERC.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/mic/papers/9610/9610004.html (text/html)
https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/mic/papers/9610/9610004.pdf (application/pdf)
https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/mic/papers/9610/9610004.ps.gz (application/postscript)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpmi:9610004

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Microeconomics from University Library of Munich, Germany
Bibliographic data for series maintained by EconWPA ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).