Why doesn't Capitalism flow to Poor Countries?
Rafael Di Tella and
Others from University Library of Munich, Germany
We find evidence consistent with the hypothesis that governments in poor countries have a more left wing rhetoric than those in OECD countries. A possible explanation is that corruption, which is more widespread in poor countries, reduces the electoral appeal of capitalism more than that of socialism. The empirical pattern of beliefs within countries is consistent with this explanation: people who perceive corruption to be high in the country are also more likely to lean left ideologically and to declare to support a more intrusive government in economic matters. Finally, we show that the corruption-left connection can be explained if corruption is seen as unfair behavior on the part of capitalists. Voters then react by moving left, even if this is materially costly to them. There is a negative ideological externality since the existence of corrupt entrepreneurs hurts good entrepreneurs by reducing the general appeal of capitalism.
Keywords: beliefs; corruption; fairness; legitimacy; ideological externality. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D6 E62 K42 P16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 42 pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hpe and nep-law
Note: Type of Document - pdf; pages: 42
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: Why Doesn't Capitalism Flow to Poor Countries? (2009)
Working Paper: Why Doesn't Capitalism Flow to Poor Countries? (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpot:0404005
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Others from University Library of Munich, Germany
Bibliographic data for series maintained by EconWPA ().