How Can the Actuarial Reduction for Social Security Early Retirement Be Right?

Natalia A. Jivan
Additional contact information
Natalia A. Jivan: Boston College
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Natalia Zhivan ()

Public Economics from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: Traditionally Social Security's Normal Retirement Age has been 65, but for the last 45 years both men and women have had the option to claim benefits at the Early Eligibility Age (EEA) of 62. In exchange for claiming early, individuals receive a smaller monthly benefit. The legislation that established the EEA reduced benefits by 5/9 of 1 percent for each month before age 65, so that a person claiming at age 62 would face a 20 percent [(5/9)*36] reduction. This publication explains the factor of 5/9 and why it has remained constant since the establishment of the EEA.

JEL-codes: D6 D7 H (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 4 pages
Date: 2004-07-12
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-lab
Note: Type of Document - pdf; pages: 4
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/pe/papers/0407/0407009.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: How Can The Actuarial Reduction For Social Security Early Retirement Be Right? (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwppe:0407009

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Public Economics from University Library of Munich, Germany
Bibliographic data for series maintained by EconWPA ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).