Contest with Attack and Defence: Does Negative Campaigning Increase or Decrease Voters' Turnout?
Raphael Soubeyran ()
Public Economics from EconWPA
We present a general model of two players contest with two types of efforts. Contrary to the classical models of contest, where each player chooses a unique effort, and where the outcome depends on the efforts of all the players, contestants are allowed to reduce the effort of the opponent. Defence increases one's chance of winning while attack annihilates the defence of the opponent. This model has many applications like political campaigning, wars, competition among lobbies, job promotion competitions, or sport contests. We study the general model of contest with attacks and defence and propose an application to negative political campaigns, where two candidates arbitrate between disparaging their opponent or enhancing their own image. We propose sufficient conditions for the existence and uniqueness of a symmetric Nash equilibrium of the contest game. In the application, we contribute to the empirically debated question dealing with the effect of attack on voters turnout, and show that the conclusion depends on the distribution of voters sensitivity to defence and attack. Furthermore, contrary to the literature, we show that an underdog candidate may be less aggressive than his opponent.
Keywords: Contest; Rent-seeking; Negative Campaigning; Turnout; Sabotage. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D74 D72 C72 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-pol
Date: 2005-10-18, Revised 2005-10-23
Note: Type of Document - pdf; pages: 30
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: Contest with attack and defense: does negative campaigning increase or decrease voter turnout? (2009)
Working Paper: Contest with Attack and Defence: Does Negative Campaigning Increase or Decrease Voters’ Turnout? (2005)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwppe:0510018
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Public Economics from EconWPA
Bibliographic data for series maintained by EconWPA ().