Pension Contributions as a Commitment device: evidence of sophistication among time-inconsistent households
Additional contact information
Patricia Sourdin: The University of Adelaide
Public Economics from EconWPA
Sophisticated agents with self-control problems value commitment devices that constrain future choices. Using Australian household data, I test whether these households value commitment devices in the form of illiquid pension contributions. Applying various probabilistic choice models, the results confirm the conjecture that households with problems of self-control are more likely to invest in illiquid pensions while less likely to hold very liquid forms of assets.
Keywords: commitment device; pensions; intertemporal choice (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D91 H31 E21 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dcm, nep-mac and nep-pbe
Note: Type of Document - pdf
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwppe:0512009
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Public Economics from EconWPA
Series data maintained by EconWPA ().