Bias in Measuring Smoking Behavior
Vidhura Tennekoon and
Robert Rosenman ()
No 2013-10, Working Papers from School of Economic Sciences, Washington State University
Researchers often use the discrepancy between the self-reported and biochemically assessed active smoking status to argue that self-reported smoking status is not reliable, ignoring the limitations of biochemically assessed measures and treating it as the gold standard in their comparisons. Here, we employ recent advances in econometric techniques to compare self-reported and biochemically assessed smoking data taking into account errors with both methods. Our results suggest that biochemical measures may not always be more reliable than self-reported data.
Keywords: smoking prevalence; misclassification; social desirability; biochemical assessments (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C13 C18 I10 I13 I18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 21 pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hea
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://faculty.ses.wsu.edu/WorkingPapers/rosenman/WP2013-10.pdf First version, 2013 (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsu:wpaper:rosenman-15
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from School of Economic Sciences, Washington State University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Danielle Engelhardt ().