The WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism – Enforcement, State Power, and Dispute Recurrence
Papers from World Trade Institute
There is a large body of literature that studies the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) Dispute Settlement Mechanism. A somewhat neglected issue in this context, however, is dispute recurrence, i.e., which factors make it more likely that the same complainant files the same dispute against the same defendant? The following paper seeks to contribute to addressing this gap. More specifically, the authors argue that less powerful complainants should not opt for dispute recurrence after having weighed the additional costs from antagonizing the defendant against the unlikely benefit of settling an issue. Specifically, although re-filing a dispute may appear as cost-efficient ex ante, it also implies reputation costs for the defendant and, thus, a complainant will antagonize a defendant if it re-files a dispute. This aspect is especially important for less powerful complainants because the defendant has shown that it considers the issue important enough to hold out despite being accused in front of an international tribunal. The empirical analysis using newly compiled data on WTO disputes in 1995-2009 strongly supports the theoretical claims.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.wti.org/media/filer_public/a6/30/a63028 ... king_paper_20137.pdf First version (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wti:papers:584
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Papers from World Trade Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Morven McLean ().