An Experimental Analysis of Decision Weights in Cumulative Prospect Theory under Uncertainty
Frank Voßmann () and
Additional contact information
Frank Voßmann: Lehrstuhl für ABWL, Finanzwirtschaft, insbesondere Bankbetriebslehre,, Postal: L 13, 15, D-68131 Mannheim
No 02-42, Sonderforschungsbereich 504 Publications from Sonderforschungsbereich 504, Universität Mannheim, Sonderforschungsbereich 504, University of Mannheim
Tversky and Kahneman's Cumulative Prospect Theory (CPT) can be seen as one of the leading descriptive theories of decision making under uncertainty. We conducted an experimental study to characterize utility function and decision weights of CPT, employing a two-step procedure based on the trade-off method. As a first step, we elicit the utility function individually for each subject and without relying on specific parametric forms. In the second step, the utility function serves as an input to determine decision weights. Our results confirm concavity of the utility function in the gain domain and bounded subadditivity of decision weights. Furthermore, we find evidence for systematic differences between the decision weights of the gain and loss domains.
Note: Financial support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, SFB 504, at the University of Mannheim, is gratefully acknowledged.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:xrs:sfbmaa:02-42
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Sonderforschungsbereich 504 Publications from Sonderforschungsbereich 504, Universität Mannheim Contact information at EDIRC., Sonderforschungsbereich 504, University of Mannheim
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Carsten Schmidt (). This e-mail address is bad, please contact .