Impacts of provider funding levels and types on demand and supply aspects of access to primary care

Lo; C.;, Anselmi; L.; and Sutton; M.;

Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers from HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York

Abstract: Despite growing evidence on how funding influences primary care provider behaviour and patient health outcomes, its effects on access are less known. We assessed the effect of payments to general practices on multiple dimensions of access in England. We used an unbalanced panel of 7,446 general practices between 2015 and 2023, linking payments to patients’ satisfaction with access and characteristics. In line with the Levesque framework, we distinguished between supply-side (provider approachability, availability, and appropriateness) and demand-side (patient ability to perceive need, reach care, and engage with care) aspects of access. We used linear two-way fixed-effects models to estimate the effects of payments, in total and by type (capitation, quality-based, activity-based, others). We estimated heterogeneous effects by stratifying practices into quintiles of need, deprivation, and population size. Higher total payment improved all access domains, with bigger gains in more deprived and in larger practices. Payment types demonstrated distinct patterns across aspects of access and practices. Capitation increased patient ability to reach care, but reduced provider capacity to deliver care in lower-need and in larger practices. Quality‑based payments increased providers’ appropriateness and patients’ engagement in lower‑need and in larger practices. Activity‑based payments showed modest positive associations with access. The positive effects of other payments were driven by dispensing-related components. Effects were attenuated when controlling for unobserved time-varying heterogeneity with interactive fixed-effects. Payment types shape different dimensions of access, with effects varying by population need, deprivation, and size. A balanced payment-mix is essential to support intended context-specific improvements in access.

Keywords: primary care; provider payment; healthcare access; inequality; England NHS (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I11 I13 I14 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-04
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.york.ac.uk/media/economics/documents/h ... papers/2026/2605.pdf Main text (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:yor:hectdg:26/05

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers from HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York HEDG/HERC, Department of Economics and Related Studies, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jane Rawlings ().