Ultimatum Bargaining Behavior in Israel, Japan, Slovenia and the United States: A Social Utility Analysis

Miguel Costa-Gomes and Klaus Zauner ()

Discussion Papers from Department of Economics, University of York

Abstract: We explain the main features of the results of the four-country ultimatum bargaining experiments of Roth, Prasnikar, Okuno-Fujiwara, and Zamir (1991) by a social utility model. The specification of social utility of a player has two parts: a linear combination of the monetary payoffs of the proposer and the responder, and payoff uncertainty. We find that, on average, responders have negative regard for proposers’ earnings in all countries. Proposers have negative regard for responders’ monetary earnings in countries where responders have high negative regard for proposers’ earnings (USA and Slovenia). In countries where responders have low negative regard for proposers’ earnings (Israel and Japan), proposers are expected payoff maximizers.

JEL-codes: A13 C19 C44 C72 C92 D63 D64 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: Ultimatum Bargaining Behavior in Israel, Japan, Slovenia, and the United States: A Social Utility Analysis (2001)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:yor:yorken:00/37

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Discussion Papers from Department of Economics, University of York Department of Economics and Related Studies, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Paul Hodgson ().