Estimating Indices in the Presence of Seller Reservation Prices
William Goetzmann () and
Yale School of Management Working Papers from Yale School of Management
This paper documents the potential bias induced in an index of asset prices when sellers use reservation rules that may include some component of private value. We develop a model in which the seller's asking price is determined by private valuation while the buyer's bid price is determined by the market valuation, and a transaction takes place only if the bid is higher than the ask. Therefore, the trading volume and the observed transaction prices are both affected by the ratio of seller's private valuation to the market valuation, which is called the seller reserve ratio. The higher the seller reserve ratio, the lower is the trading volume and the larger is the difference between the market valuations estimated using observed prices and the actual market valuations. To address the estimation problem posed by the bias, we propose a three-step econometric procedure. We first estimate the index using observed prices. We next use residuals from the first step and observed trading volume to estimate the latent series of seller reserve ratio and the unconditional population variance of pricing errors. We then use these estimates in step two to correct for the bias in the index based on observed prices in either a hedonic regression or a repeat sale regression. We call the unbiased index a reserve-conditional index. Simulations show that this remedy effectively mitigates the bias, and the reserve-conditional indices are more accurate than traditional hedonic and repeat sale indices. We apply this technique to Los Angele
Date: 2003-04-01, Revised 2003-05-01
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Can't connect to icfpub.som.yale.edu:80 (A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond.)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ysm:somwrk:ysm352
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Yale School of Management Working Papers from Yale School of Management Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().