Improved Forecasting of Mutual Fund Alphas and Betas
Matthew Spiegel,
Harry Mamaysky and
Hong Zhang
Yale School of Management Working Papers from Yale School of Management
Abstract:
This paper proposes a simple back testing procedure that is shown to dramatically improve a panel data model's ability to produce out of sample forecasts. Here the procedure is used to forecast mutual fund alphas. Using monthly data with an OLS model it has been difficult to consistently predict which portfolio managers will produce above market returns for their investors. This paper provides empirical evidence that sorting on the estimated alphas populates the top and bottom deciles not with the best and worst funds, but with those having the greatest estimation error. This problem can be attenuated by back testing the statistical model fund by fund. The back test used here requires a statistical model to exhibit some past predictive success for a particular fund before it is allowed to make predictions about that fund in the current period. Another estimation problem concerns the use of a single statistical model for all available mutual funds. Since mutual funds often, but not always, employ dynamic trading strategies their betas move over time in a ways that differ from fund to fund. Since no one statistical model is likely to fit every fund, the result is a great deal of misspecification error. This paper shows that the combined use of an OLS and Kalman filter model increases the number of funds with predictable out of sample alphas by about 60%. Overall, a strategy that uses very modest ex-ante filters to eliminate funds whose parameters likely derive primarily from estimation errors produces an out of sample risk adjusted return of over 4% per annum.
Keywords: Mutual fund performance; back test (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005-07-01, Revised 2006-03-01
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://repec.som.yale.edu/icfpub/publications/2361.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ysm:wpaper:amz2361
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Yale School of Management Working Papers from Yale School of Management Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().