Rethinking the Structure of Accounting and Auditing

Shyam Sunder

Yale School of Management Working Papers from Yale School of Management

Abstract: Failures in corporate governance of many major US corporations in 2002 suggest that it may be useful to fundamentally rethink the structure of institutions of accounting, auditing, corporate governance and executive compensation. Replacement of the system of authoritative standards by a competitive, common law approach to accounting principles and rules may help shift the focus of financial reporting from form to substance. Following some key Supreme Court rulings, the quality of auditing declined under the governmental push to increase competition in that industry beginning with the late seventies, pushing audit firms to peddle consulting services to their clients for economic survival. Restoring the high quality of audit may require radical reorganization of the audit function, such as bundling it with insurance. The protection of minority interest by the board of directors and the control of runaway executive compensat

Date: 2003-06-01
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://repec.som.yale.edu/icfpub/publications/2373.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Rethinking the Structure of Accounting and Auditing (2003)
Working Paper: Rethinking the Structure of Accounting and Auditing (2003)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ysm:wpaper:ysm392

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Yale School of Management Working Papers from Yale School of Management Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().