Optimal Abatement in Dynamic Multipollutant Problems when Pollutants can be Complements or Substitutes
Ulf Moslener and
Till Requate ()
No 2005-03, Economics Working Papers from Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Department of Economics
Abstract:
We analyze a dynamic multi-pollutant problem where abatement costs of several pollutants are not separable. The pollutants can be either technological substitutes or complements. Environmental damage is induced by the stock of accumulated pollution. We find that optimal emission paths are qualitatively different for substitutes and complements. We derive general properties governing optimal emission paths and present numerical examples to illustrate our main results. In particular we find that optimal emission paths need not be monotonic, even for highly symmetric pollutants. Finally, we describe a comparatively simple method to implement the optimal path without explicitly knowing its shape.
Keywords: Multi-pollution; abatement technology; accumulating pollutants (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L5 Q2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ene and nep-env
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/21991/1/EWP-2005-03.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Optimal abatement in dynamic multi-pollutant problems when pollutants can be complements or substitutes (2007) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:cauewp:2913
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Economics Working Papers from Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().