On the Credibility of Currency Boards
Switgard Feuerstein () and
Oliver Grimm ()
No 36, Center for European, Governance and Economic Development Research Discussion Papers from University of Goettingen, Department of Economics
The paper compares the credibility of currency boards and (standard) pegs. Abandoning a currency board requires a time-consuming legislative process and an abolition will thus be previously expected. Therefore, a currency board solves the time inconsistency problem of monetary policy. However, policy can react to unexpected shocks only with a time lag, thus the threat of large shocks makes the abolition more likely. Currency boards are more credible than standard pegs if the time inconsistency problem dominates. In contrast, standard pegs, that can be left at short notice, are more credible if exogenous shocks are highly volatile and constitute the dominant problem.
Keywords: monetary policy; currency board; standard peg; credibility; time inconsistency problem; stochastic purchasing power parity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F33 E52 E42 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: On the Credibility of Currency Boards* (2006)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:cegedp:36
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Center for European, Governance and Economic Development Research Discussion Papers from University of Goettingen, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().