Accounting for fetal origins: Health capital vs. health deficits
Carl-Johan Dalgaard (),
Casper Hansen () and
Holger Strulik ()
No 385, University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics from University of Goettingen, Department of Economics
The fetal origins hypothesis has received considerable empirical support, both within epidemiology and economics. The present study compares the ability of two rival theoretical frameworks in accounting for the kind of path dependence implied by the fetal origins hypothesis. We argue that while the conventional health capital model is irreconcilable with fetal origins of late-in-life health outcomes, the more recent health deficit model can generate shock amplification consistent with the hypothesis. We also develop a theory of ontogenetic growth in utero and during childhood, unify it with the theory of adult aging, and discuss the transmission of early-life shocks to late-life health deficit accumulation.
Keywords: Fetal Origins; Health Capital; Health Deficits; Ontogenetic Growth; In Utero Development (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D91 I10 J13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-evo, nep-gro and nep-hea
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: Accounting for Fetal Origins: Health Capital vs. Health Deficits (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:cegedp:385
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics from University of Goettingen, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().