The consequences of academic match between students and colleges
Eleanor Wiske Dillon and
Jeffrey Smith ()
No 5, CLEF Working Paper Series from Canadian Labour Economics Forum (CLEF), University of Waterloo
We consider the effects of student ability, college quality, and the interaction between the two on academic outcomes and future earnings. Both ability and college quality strongly improve outcomes and earnings. We find little evidence to support the "mismatch" hypothesis that college quality and ability interact in substantively important ways. All students benefit from attending higher quality colleges. Our estimates imply that resorting students to eliminate mismatch, without changing the capacity of any colleges, would raise expected graduation rates by only 0.6 percentage points and mean earnings by $400 per year. The substantial gains for students who move to higher quality colleges under this reshuffling roughly cancel out the losses of students who move down.
Keywords: college quality; mismatch (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I21 J31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/203336/1/C ... 016-Dillon-Smith.pdf (application/pdf)
Working Paper: The Consequences of Academic Match between Students and Colleges (2018)
Working Paper: The Consequences of Academic Match between Students and Colleges (2017)
Working Paper: The Consequences of Academic Match between Students and Colleges (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:clefwp:5
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CLEF Working Paper Series from Canadian Labour Economics Forum (CLEF), University of Waterloo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().