Investment dispute settlement à la carte within a multilateral institution: A path forward for the UNCITRAL process?

Stephan W. Schill and Geraldo Vidigal

No 248, Columbia FDI Perspectives from Columbia University, Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI)

Abstract: Divergent models for investment dispute settlement risk producing legal fragmentation. States should consider a Multilateral Institution for Dispute Settlement on Investment (MIDSI) permitting dispute settlement "à la carte". Within MIDSI, a Multilateral Investment Court could settle investor-state disputes on an opt-in basis and serve other systemic functions.

Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/254082/1/fdi-perspectives-no248.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:colfdi:248

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Columbia FDI Perspectives from Columbia University, Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().