Indirect FDI under EU FDI regulation in times of war: Is the anti-circumvention clause enough?

Fabrizio Di Benedetto

No 372, Columbia FDI Perspectives from Columbia University, Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI)

Abstract: This Perspective explores the consequences of the ECJ decision in the Xella case over the protection of EU security from threats linked to indirect FDI. While the judgement excludes them from the scope of the EU FDI Screening Regulation, this Perspective offers a solution to include them under its scope.

Date: 2023
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-int
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/281046/1/1874097291.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:colfdi:281046

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Columbia FDI Perspectives from Columbia University, Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().