Judicial Detection Skill and Contractual Compliance
Roland Kirstein and
No 97-07, CSLE Discussion Paper Series from Saarland University, CSLE - Center for the Study of Law and Economics
Mutually beneficial agreements might fail if the parties fear contractual opportunism. Litigation is supposed to be a remedy, but gives scope for another kind of opportunistic behavior which we call litigational opportunism: Even knowing that the opponent has fulfilled his obligations, a party might bring suit. We introduce a new concept, called judicial detection skill, and show that positive judicial detection skill is a prerequisite if the court system is to deter opportunistic suits and simultaneously induce bilateral contractual compliance. The traditional literature on litigation either assumes judges with zero detection skill, or simply neglects that opportunistic suits might be successful. We prove that those models are unable to provide an answer to the question of how to prevent both types of opportunism simultaneously.
Keywords: Economic analysis of procedural law; judicial detection skill; litigational opportunism; contractual opportunism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C72 K41 K12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (29) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: Judicial detection skill and contractual compliance (1997)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:csledp:9707
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CSLE Discussion Paper Series from Saarland University, CSLE - Center for the Study of Law and Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().