Individual Discount Rates: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Evidence

Jindřich Matoušek, Tomas Havranek and Zuzana Irsova

EconStor Preprints from ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics

Abstract: A key parameter estimated by lab and field experiments in economics is the individual discount rate---and the results vary widely. We examine the extent to which this variance can be attributed to observable differences in methods, subject pools, and potential publication bias. To address the model uncertainty inherent to such an exercise, we employ Bayesian model averaging. We find occasional but widespread publication bias against unintuitive results: in consequence, the mean reported discount rate is inflated twofold. Our results suggest that estimates decrease with the time horizon, a finding consistent with hyperbolic discounting. Discount rates are similar for money and health questions, but people tend to be less patient in exotic contexts (e.g., when offered a kiss from a movie star). Africans are less patient than people from other continents. Finally, the results of lab and field experiments differ systematically, and it also matters whether the experiment relies on students or uses broader samples of the population.

Keywords: Discount rate; experiment; publication bias; meta-analysis; Bayesian model averaging (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C83 C90 D01 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp, nep-hea and nep-ore
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/194617/1/discrate.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Individual discount rates: a meta-analysis of experimental evidence (2022)
Working Paper: Individual Discount Rates: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Evidence (2021)
Working Paper: Individual Discount Rates: A Meta-Analysis of the Experimental Evidence (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:esprep:194617

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in EconStor Preprints from ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().