The Prewar-Postwar Output Volatility and Shock-Persistence Debate: A Closer Look and New Results
Hashem Dezhbakhsh and
Daniel Levy
EconStor Preprints from ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics
Abstract:
It is well established that the U.S. prewar output was more volatile and less shock-persistent than the postwar output. This is often attributed to the data interpolation employed to construct the prewar series, rather than the postwar stabilization policies and institutional changes. Our analytical results, however, indicate that commonly used linear interpolation has the opposite effect on shock persistence and volatility of a series—it reduces short-run volatility and raises shock persistence. Therefore, interpolation does not seem to explain away the observed gaps between the volatility and shock persistence of the prewar and postwar series. If anything, it may hide part of the true gap. Consequently, our results strengthen the case that the prewar-postwar difference reflects real economic changes rather than interpolation, leaving stabilization policies and institutional changes as possible explanations. Our results hold for parsimonious stationary and nonstationary time series commonly used to model macroeconomic data. Our theoretical finding is also supported by a counterfactual empirical exercise we conduct using U.S. postwar series
Keywords: Business Cycles; Output Volatility; Shock Persistence; Prewar vs Poswar Time Series; Linear Interpolation; Variance Ratio; Stationary Series; Nonstationary Series; Periodic Nonstationarity; Missing Observations; Macroeconomic Stabilization; Economic Policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C02 C18 C22 C82 E01 E32 N10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
Note: The file contains the paper and the appendix
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/343604/1/M ... ix-Interpolation.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: Prewar-Postwar Output Volatility and Shock-Persistence Debate: A Closer Look and New Results (2026) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:esprep:343604
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.7452018
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in EconStor Preprints from ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().