University Selectivity and the Relative Returns to Higher Education: Evidence from the UK

Ian Walker () and Yu Zhu

No 133, GLO Discussion Paper Series from Global Labor Organization (GLO)

Abstract: We study the labour market wage outcomes of university graduates by course (i.e. by subject and institution) in the UK using the Labour Force Survey (LFS). We match this data to a measure of course “selectivity” (the mean standardised admission scores at the course level) using data on high school achievement scores of students admitted to these courses. Unlike earlier UK studies, we are able to consider the effect of differences across undergraduate degree subjects, and in particular the selectivity of both the subject studied and of the Higher Education Institution (HEI) attended. Our results show that selectivity of undergraduate degree programmes plays an important role in explaining the variation in the relative graduate wages across HEIs and subjects. In fact, much of the observed differential in relative wage outcomes across courses is due to the quality of students that HEIs select. That is not to say that the effect of course selectivity on wages implies that degrees are just signals of existing ability differences.

Keywords: College selectivity; relative returns to higher education (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I23 I26 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cta, nep-edu and nep-eur
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/170487/1/GLO-DP-0133.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: University selectivity and the relative returns to higher education: Evidence from the UK (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:glodps:133

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in GLO Discussion Paper Series from Global Labor Organization (GLO) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().