EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Lasting Impact of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study: COVID-19 Vaccination Hesitation among African Americans

Xiaolong Hou, Yang Jiao, Leilei Shen and Zhuo Chen

No 1397, GLO Discussion Paper Series from Global Labor Organization (GLO)

Abstract: It is widely recognized that African Americans have a higher level of mistrust towards the medical and health care sector, which results in insufficient utilization of public health services, low participation in clinical research, and vaccination hesitancy. While the Tuskegee Syphilis Study has been identified as a key factor in this mistrust, its specific influence on COVID-19 vaccination uptake among African Americans remains unexplored. Our paper fills this research gap. Our results suggest that the difference in COVID-19 vaccination rates between communities with low and high proportions of Black residents decreases during the study period, but the gap persists. Notably, counties closer to Tuskegee exhibit a slower rate of progress in reducing the racial disparity in COVID-19 vaccination, indicating that the lingering mistrust stemming from the Tuskegee Study has contributed to unequal vaccination rates between African Americans and the rest of America.

Keywords: Vaccination; COVID-19; Racial Disparity; Tuskegee (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I1 N9 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hea
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/283882/1/GLO-DP-1397.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: The lasting impact of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study: COVID-19 vaccination hesitation among African Americans (2024) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:glodps:1397

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in GLO Discussion Paper Series from Global Labor Organization (GLO) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (econstor@zbw-workspace.eu).

 
Page updated 2025-03-31
Handle: RePEc:zbw:glodps:1397