Assessing Targeted Containment Policies to Fight COVID-19
Ariadne Checo,
Francesco Grigoli () and
Jose Manuel Mota Aquino ()
No 752, GLO Discussion Paper Series from Global Labor Organization (GLO)
Abstract:
The large economic costs of full-blown lockdowns in response to COVID-19 outbreaks, coupled with heterogeneous mortality rates across age groups, led to question non-discriminatory containment mea- sures. In this paper we provide an assessment of the targeted approach to containment. We propose a SIR-macro model that allows for heterogeneous agents in terms of mortality rates and contact rates, and in which the government optimally bans people from working. We find that under a targeted pol- icy, the optimal containment reaches a larger portion of the population than under a blanket policy and is held in place for longer. Compared to a blanket policy, a targeted approach results in a smaller death count. Yet, it is not a panacea: the recession is larger under such approach as the containment policy applies to a larger fraction of people, remains in place for longer, and herd immunity is achieved later. Moreover, we find that increased interactions between low- and high-risk individuals effectively reduce the benefits of a targeted approach to containment.
Keywords: Optimal containment policies; COVID-19; heterogeneous agents; mortality rate; voluntary social distancing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E10 H00 I10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mac
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/228506/1/GLO-DP-0752.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Assessing Targeted Containment Policies to Fight COVID-19 (2022) 
Working Paper: Assessing Targeted Containment Policies to Fight COVID-19 (2020) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:glodps:752
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in GLO Discussion Paper Series from Global Labor Organization (GLO) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().