Are temporary jobs stepping stones or dead ends? A meta-analytical review of the literature
Mattia Filomena and
Matteo Picchio ()
No 841, GLO Discussion Paper Series from Global Labor Organization (GLO)
We present a meta-analysis on the debate about the "stepping stone vs. dead end" hypothesis related to the causal effect of temporary jobs on future labour market performances. We select academic papers published on international peer-reviewed journals from 1990 until 2021. Among 78 observations from 64 articles, 32% support the hypothesis according to which temporary contracts are a port of entry into stable employment positions, 23% report ambiguous or mixed findings, and the remaining 45% provide evidence in favour of the dead end hypothesis. The results from meta-regressions suggest that the stepping stone effect is more likely to emerge when self-selectivity issues are dealt with, especially when using the timing-of-events approach. The studies focusing on temporary work agency jobs and casual/seasonal jobs detect more easily results in favour of the dead end hypothesis. Finally, in more recent years and when the unemployment rate is larger, the dead end hypothesis is more likely to prevail.
Keywords: Meta-analysis; labour market; temporary jobs; stepping stones; dead ends (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J08 J41 J42 J81 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-lma
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: ARE TEMPORARY JOBS STEPPING STONES OR DEAD ENDS? A META-ANALYTICAL REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE (2021)
Working Paper: Are Temporary Jobs Stepping Stones or Dead Ends? A Meta-Analytical Review of the Literature (2021)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:glodps:841
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in GLO Discussion Paper Series from Global Labor Organization (GLO) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().