Long-term unemployment, technical progress and capital mobility in an open growth-matching model
Angela Birk
No 171, HWWA Discussion Papers from Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWA)
Abstract:
How does technical progress affect long-term unemployment in a small open economy? This relationship is evaluated in an open neoclassical growth model that is extended by a Pissarides-style labor market matching approach. In the general equilibrium model, the labor market of the three factor growth model is characterized by immobile heterogeneous jobless workers. International capital mobility represents the efficient intertemporal allocation of world resources. Depending on a parametric growth condition, an increase in technical progress implies a favorable capitalization effect respectively an unfavorable Schumpeterian creative destruction effect. Secondary effects in form of a stigmatization and a human capital depreciation effect are generated and influence the unemployment duration and the fraction of long-term unemployment negatively. Additionally, the model shows that even in the steady state a constant current account deficit for a net debtor is sustained that rises even more as productivity growth increases.
Keywords: long-term unemployment; technical progress; capital mobility; growth (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E24 F41 O41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2002
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/19333/1/171.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:hwwadp:26206
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in HWWA Discussion Papers from Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWA) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().