 Protektion passé?Rolf H. Hasse No 189, HWWA Discussion Papers from Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWA) Abstract: The question of the state and the evolution of protectionism often gets a simplified answer: The main view is that the GATT Rounds have been achieving a continuous reduction. This view is partly revised based on four propositions: (1) Protectionism is an integral part of the international division of labour. (2) The international division of labour has been steadily growing, but so did the protection of the national value added, too. (3) The analyses of the GATT Rounds neglect the essential protective effects of exchange controls and exchange rate misalignments. (4) The extension of the GATT principles to the trade in services (GATS) and intellectual property rights (TRIPS) will cause and increase (new) protectionist measures, because the demand for protection is steady and flexible. Two proposals are offered to contain a rising demand for protection and to strengthen the GATT principles. First, a proposal for an endogenous barrier to this demand. Second, a concept of how the countries of the Triad (EU, Japan, USA) may reduce their trade conflicts and thereby help strengthening the GATT rules. Keywords: International Economic Order; Commercial Policy; Trade Negotiations (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:hwwadp:26239 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in HWWA Discussion Papers from Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWA) Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.