A Comment on "The formality effect"

Samuel Arispe and Diego Marino Fages

No 252, I4R Discussion Paper Series from The Institute for Replication (I4R)

Abstract: In this comment, we computationally reproduce the results of Linos et al. (2024), which shows contrary to researcher and practitioner predictions, that formal government communications are more effective at influencing resident behavior than informal government communications. We succeeded in reproducing the main findings and extended the analysis by exploring the heterogeneity of the results in terms of age, education and gender. Overall, the main results of the paper appear in the selected subsets of the sample, but some heterogeneity emerges. For instance, males are less likely (than females) to perceive formal letters as formal, but the effect of formality on the likelihood of acting is also higher than for females.

Keywords: formality; government communication; persuasion; experiments (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C9 D9 H00 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/323246/1/I4R-DP252.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:i4rdps:252

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in I4R Discussion Paper Series from The Institute for Replication (I4R)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().