Computational Reproducibility of Heiserman & Simpson (2023)
Ann-Kathrin Torka,
Lukas Wallrich and
Jingze Wang
No 288, I4R Discussion Paper Series from The Institute for Replication (I4R)
Abstract:
We report a computational reproducibility assessment of Heiserman and Simpson (2023), who examined the causal effects of workplace discrimination on employees' work effort across five experiments (total analytic N = 1,041) and a manager survey (N = 107). Using the authors' publicly available data and reproducing the published analyses in R (the original used Stata), we closely reproduce the reported reward-expectation results, the main work-effort pattern, the mediation decomposition, and the manager-survey results. We identify seven minor reporting discrepancies between the manuscript, supplement, and reproduced values, none of which changes the substantive conclusions. Extension analyses meta-analytically pool count-model results that the original supplement reports only per-study, conduct additional meta-analytic robustness checks (leave-one-study-out, exclusion sensitivity), and assess pre-registration adherence using Lakens' severity framework. Overall, we find that conclusions weaken under some alternative analytical choices, but that the main claim is robust.
Keywords: computational reproducibility; discrimination; work effort (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/339569/1/I4R-DP288.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:i4rdps:288
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in I4R Discussion Paper Series from The Institute for Replication (I4R)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().